Early relapse after rituximab treatment in a patient with seronegative neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a case report

Article information

Ann Clin Neurophysiol. 2024;26(2):54-56
Publication date (electronic) : 2024 September 26
doi : https://doi.org/10.14253/acn.24001
1Department of Neurology, Kangwon National University Hospital, Chuncheon, Korea
2Department of Translational Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
3Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Seoul Metropolitan Government Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence to Yoon-Ho Hong Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Seoul Metropolitan Government Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 20 Boramae-ro 5-gil, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 07061, Korea Tel: +82-2-2266-7238 Fax: +82-2-831-2826 E-mail: nrhong@gmail.com
Received 2024 January 26; Revised 2024 March 22; Accepted 2024 May 9.

Abstract

Rituximab (RTX) is a monoclonal antibody that targets CD20 on B cells and is used to reduce the relapse risk in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Some patients experience relapse or exacerbation shortly after RTX treatment. We report a 54-year-old female with seronegative NMOSD who relapsed soon after RTX treatment.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a demyelinating inflammatory autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that primarily affects the optic nerve and spinal cord.1 Rituximab (RTX) is a monoclonal antibody that has been found to reduce the relapse risk in NMOSD.2 However, some patients experience relapse or exacerbation shortly after RTX treatment,3-6 the mechanism of which is currently unclear. Here we report a case of the RTX-induced rebound phenomenon in seronegative NMOSD.

CASE

A 54-year-old female was admitted to with acute bilateral visual disturbances. These disturbances were attributed to inflammatory lesions that involved the optic chiasm (Fig. 1A). The patient had two previous inflammatory episodes in the CNS. She had presented with double vision and decreased visual acuity in the right eye 4 years previously. She experienced longitudinal extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) at the C2-C6 level 2 years later, and presented with right arm numbness, weakness, and gait disturbance. Both episodes exhibited a favorable response to steroid pulse therapy.

Fig. 1.

Serial brain MRI revealed the disease exacerbation shortly following RTX treatment. FLAIR MRI revealed hyperintense lesions at the optic chiasm (red arrow) and right temporal horn of the lateral ventricle (blue dot circle) at 1 month prior to the initial RTX infusion (A) and at 2 weeks posttreatment (B). (C, D) Post-enhancement images corresponding to (A) and (B), respectively, revealing mild gadolinium enhancement with no significant changes. MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; RTX, rituximab; FLAIR, fluid attenuated inversion recovery.

On admission, the visual acuity had decreased from 1.0 to 0.6 in the right eye but remained unchanged in the left eye. Visual field testing revealed hemianopia accompanied by a relative afferent pupillary defect in both eyes. No additional neurological deficits were observed. Laboratory analysis revealed an antinuclear antibody level of less than 1:40, with negative results for all autoantibodies including antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody and rheumatoid factor. She consistently tested negative for both myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) and aquaporin 4-immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG) antibodies throughout the disease course. Serum analysis was performed to detect AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG using a flow cytometry-based live cell assay with AQP4- and MOG-transfected cells. She met the diagnostic criteria for seronegative NMOSD with two key clinical features: optic neuritis and LETM.7

Following intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy, she was maintained on oral prednisolone. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was initiated at 2 g/day as a steroid-sparing agent, allowing for the gradual tapering of the oral steroid. She developed leukopenia 1 year after MMF treatment was initiated, which persisted despite adjusting the dose of MMF to 1 g/day. MMF therefore had to be discontinued.

She experienced a relapse of optic neuritis that involved the optic chiasm 3 months after MMF was discontinued, and presented with bilateral visual disturbance (Fig. 1A). She immediately started steroid pulse therapy at the time of hospitalization, followed shortly by RTX (protocol: 375 mg/m2/week intravenous for 4 weeks). At 7 days after the first RTX infusion, she reported symptom deterioration with almost total blindness in the right eye and only finger counting in the left eye. Subsequent brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed increased intensity of the T2-weighted/fluid attenuated inversion recovery hyperintensity lesion in the optic chiasm (Fig. 1B) accompanied by mild gadolinium enhancement (Fig. 1C, D), relative to MRI conducted approximately 2 weeks earlier. Plasma exchange was performed to address this acute exacerbation, which improved the visual impairment.

Discussion

The exact mechanisms that underlie the acute exacerbation or relapse shortly after RTX treatment are not understood. One hypothesis is that RTX-induced rapid B-cell depletion inadvertently elevate the levels of proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin 6, B-cell activating factor, and tumor necrosis factor alpha, which can all be accompanied by increased T cell activity.8 Gong et al.9 also found that germinal-center B cells exhibit resistance to RTX-induced apoptosis. This resistance could lead to the clonal expansion of memory B cells in germinal centers, which would be further fueled by the aforementioned proinflammatory cytokines. These persistent cytokines have been postulated to contribute to the rebound phenomenon, and could explain why acute exacerbation or relapse can occur during this period.

Sixteen cases of RTX-induced exacerbation or relapse have been reported in the literature, primarily in patients who were seropositive for antiaquaporin-4 antibodies. It is particularly notable that more than half of these cases occurred after the active or acute phase of the disease, had a previous episode within 3 months, and where the location of the relapse overlapped with that of the pre-RTX relapse.3 The decision to treat using RTX should therefore be informed by the possibility of RTX-induced rebound phenomenon and its typical period. Close monitoring during initial RTX therapy may be necessary in patients with active disease due to the increased risk of exacerbation or relapse, even for those who are seronegative. Initiating RTX treatment during a stable phase of the disease, where feasible, may help to mitigate this risk.

Notes

Conflicts of Interest

Yoon-Ho Hong serves as the Editor-in-Chief of ACN and was not involved in the review process of this article. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Funding

None.

References

1. Jarius S, Paul F, Weinshenker BG, Levy M, Kim HJ, Wildemann B. Neuromyelitis optica. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2020;6:85.
2. Huang W, Wang L, Zhang B, Zhou L, Zhang T, Quan C. Effectiveness and tolerability of immunosuppressants and monoclonal antibodies in preventive treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2019;35:246–252.
3. Shi B, Zhao M, Qiao L, Huang F, Zhou S, Wei Y, et al. Relapses shortly after rituximab treatment in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2021;54:103143.
4. Jacob A, Weinshenker BG, Violich I, McLinskey N, Krupp L, Fox RJ, et al. Treatment of neuromyelitis optica with rituximab: retrospective analysis of 25 patients. Arch Neurol 2008;65:1443–1448.
5. Lindsey JW, Meulmester KM, Brod SA, Nelson F, Wolinsky JS. Variable results after rituximab in neuromyelitis optica. J Neurol Sci 2012;317:103–105.
6. Perumal JS, Kister I, Howard J, Herbert J. Disease exacerbation after rituximab induction in neuromyelitis optica. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2015;2e61.
7. Wingerchuk DM, Banwell B, Bennett JL, Cabre P, Carroll W, Chitnis T, et al. International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurology 2015;85:177–189.
8. Maurer MA, Tuller F, Gredler V, Berger T, Lutterotti A, Lünemann JD, et al. Rituximab induces clonal expansion of IgG memory B-cells in patients with inflammatory central nervous system demyelination. J Neuroimmunol 2016;290:49–53.
9. Gong Q, Ou Q, Ye S, Lee WP, Cornelius J, Diehl L, et al. Importance of cellular microenvironment and circulatory dynamics in B cell immunotherapy. J Immunol 2005;174:817–826.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

Serial brain MRI revealed the disease exacerbation shortly following RTX treatment. FLAIR MRI revealed hyperintense lesions at the optic chiasm (red arrow) and right temporal horn of the lateral ventricle (blue dot circle) at 1 month prior to the initial RTX infusion (A) and at 2 weeks posttreatment (B). (C, D) Post-enhancement images corresponding to (A) and (B), respectively, revealing mild gadolinium enhancement with no significant changes. MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; RTX, rituximab; FLAIR, fluid attenuated inversion recovery.