• KSCN
  • KSPAD
  • KSND
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Page Path

Original Article

Ultrasonographic findings of the normal diaphragm: thickness and contractility

Jung Im Seok1, Shin Yeop Kim1, Francis O. Walker2, Sang Gyu Kwak3, Doo Hyuk Kwon4
Annals of Clinical Neurophysiology 2017;19(2):131-135.
Published online: July 24, 2017
1Department of Neurology, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
2Department of Neurology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
3Medical Statistics & Informatics, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
4Department of Neurology, CHA Gumi Medical Center, CHA University, Gumi, Korea
Corresponding author:  Francis O. Walker, Tel: +1-336-716-7548 , Fax: +1-336-716-7794, 
Email: fwalker@wakehealth.edu
Received: 9 March 2017   • Revised: 26 April 2017   • Accepted: 12 May 2017
  • 2,771 Views
  • 85 Download
  • 11 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus
prev next

Background
Neuromuscular ultrasound can be used to assess the diaphragm. Before it can be used clinically, the reference ranges of diaphragm thickness and contractility must be determined. Methods: We measured the thickness of the diaphragm and the diaphragmatic thickening fraction (DTF) in 80 healthy volunteers with ultrasound and collected their demographic information to determine if age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) influence these measures. Results: The thickness of the diaphragm at resting end expiration was 0.193 ± 0.044 cm on the right side and 0.187 ± 0.039 cm on the left. The DTF was 104.8 ± 50.6% on the right side and 114.9 ± 49.2% on the left. Sex, weight, height, and BMI significantly affected the thickness of the diaphragm, but had little effect on the DTF. Conclusions: Normal reference values for the diaphragm should be helpful when evaluating the diaphragm. The DTF appears more useful than resting diaphragm thickness because it is affected less by individual variation.

TOP