• KSCN
  • KSPAD
  • KSND
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Page Path

4
results for

"Guideline"

Filter

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

Authors

"Guideline"

Review Articles

Updating Recommendation on Neuropathic Pain Management
Seung Woo Kim
Korean J Neuromuscul Disord 2024;16(1):5-9.   Published online June 30, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46518/kjnmd.2024.16.1.5
Neuropathic pain is defined as pain caused by lesions or diseases of the somatosensory system. Management of neuropathic pain is difficult owing to the heterogeneity of underlying causes and absence of objective standards for diagnosis and assessment of neuropathic pain. In this review, we reviewed the recently published guidelines regarding the pharmacological management of neuropathic pain including the French recommendations and the German Neurological Association guidelines, and the American Neurological Association's guidelines for the management of diabetic polyneuropathy. In general, drugs recommended as the first-line treatment for neuropathic pain include gabapentinoid, serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), and tricyclic antidepressants. As the second-line treatment, combination of SNRI or tricyclic antidepressant with gabapentinoid could be recommended. Although tramadol and tapentadol are recommended as the second- or third-line treatment, caution is required in long-term use of these medications due to the side effects including dependence and abuse. Besides efficacy, it is necessary to consider the side effects of the medication and underlying disease of the patient in selecting pharmacological treatment.
  • 3,046 View
  • 96 Download
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for neuropathic pain
Sooyoung Kim, Eun Kyoung Lee, Eunhee Sohn
Ann Clin Neurophysiol 2022;24(2):53-58.   Published online October 31, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14253/acn.2022.24.2.53
Noninvasive stimulation of the nervous system for treating chronic neuropathic pain has received attention because of its tolerability and relative efficacy. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a representative method of noninvasive brain stimulation. Evidence-based guidelines on therapeutic use of rTMS have been proposed recently for several neurological diseases. These guidelines recommend treating neuropathic pain by applying high-frequency (≥ 5 Hz) rTMS to the primary motor cortex contralateral to the painful side. This review summarizes the mechanisms and guidelines of rTMS for treating neuropathic pain, and proposes directions for future research.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for phantom limb pain- a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials
    FNU Chandni, FNU Savanti, Rohit Kumar, Murk Raj, Aakash Kumar, Aashish Kumar, Sejal Kinger, Sahil Kumar, Himat Rai, Afsana Ansari Shaik, Muhammad Sohaib Asghar
    Neurological Sciences.2025; 46(5): 2019.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Titanium Skull Plate on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Analysis of Induced Electric Fields
    Mai Lu, Shoogo Ueno
    Life.2024; 14(5): 642.     CrossRef
  • Synaptic sensitization in the anterior cingulate cortex sustains the consciousness of pain via synchronized oscillating electromagnetic waves
    Richard Ambron
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Dualism, Materialism, and the relationship between the brain and the mind in experiencing pain
    Richard Ambron
    Neuroscience.2024; 561: 139.     CrossRef
  • 10,972 View
  • 256 Download
  • 4 Crossref

Special Article

Clinical practice guidelines for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring: 2020 update
Korean Society of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring , Korean Neurological Association , Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine , Korean Society of Clinical Neurophysiology , Korean Association of EMG Electrodiagnostic Medicine
Ann Clin Neurophysiol 2021;23(1):35-45.   Published online April 29, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14253/acn.2021.23.1.35
The utility and accuracy of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has evolved greatly following the recent development of new devices for neurophysiological testing and advances in anesthesiology. Until recently, the need for IONM services has been limited to large academic hospitals, but the demand for neurophysiologists with expertise in IONM has grown rapidly across diverse types of hospital. The primary goal of the Korean Society of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring (KSION) is to promote the development of IONM research groups and to contribute to the improvement of fellowship among members and human health through academic projects. These guidelines are based on extensive literature reviews, recruitment of expert opinions, and consensus among KSION board members. This version of the guidelines was fully approved by the KSION, Korean Association of EMG Electrodiagnostic Medicine, the Korean Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine, and the Korean Neurological Association.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Intraoperative Monitoring of Sensory Evoked Potentials in Neurosurgery: A Personalized Approach
    Evgeny A. Levin
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2025; 15(1): 26.     CrossRef
  • Role of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Pediatric Tethered Cord Syndrome Surgeries and Technical Insights
    Wael Abd Elrahman Ali Elmesallamy, Alshaimaa Abdel Fattah Kamel, Ahmad Fahmy, Mohamed Elbana, Mahmoud M. Taha
    Indian Journal of Neurosurgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A multichannel electromyography dataset for continuous intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of cranial nerve
    Wanting Ma, Lin Chen, Xiaofan Pang, Yuanwen Zou
    Data in Brief.2024; 53: 110250.     CrossRef
  • Intraoperative neuromonitoring in intracranial surgery
    G.B. Adkins, A. Mirallave Pescador, A.H. Koht, S.P. Gosavi
    BJA Education.2024; 24(5): 173.     CrossRef
  • Neurophysiological monitoring during endovascular treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations: A meta-analysis
    Francesco Diana, Michele Romoli, Federico Sabuzi, Aymeric Rouchaud, Charbel Mounayer, Géraud Forestier, Alejandro Tomasello, Manuel Requena, David Hernández, Marta De Dios Lascuevas, José Luis Cuevas, Simone Peschillo, Jildaz Caroff, Thanh N. Nguyen, Moha
    Interventional Neuroradiology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during the surgeries for the ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament
    Seol-Hee Baek
    Journal of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.2022; 4(2): 55.     CrossRef
  • Hemodynamic Consideration in Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Neuromuscular Scoliosis Surgery
    Seok Young Chung, Chae Hwan Lim, Yoon Ghil Park, Hak Sun Kim, Dawoon Kim, Jinyoung Park
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2022; 46(6): 292.     CrossRef
  • Undetected abulic state after anterior communicating artery aneurysm surgery under motor evoked potential (MEP) and somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) monitoring
    Hyesun Lee, Jinseok Park
    Journal of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.2022; 4(2): 78.     CrossRef
  • Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in pituitary adenoma surgery: case report
    Hyun-Wook Nam, Seol-Hee Baek
    Journal of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.2021; 3(2): 108.     CrossRef
  • 19,393 View
  • 795 Download
  • 9 Crossref
Chronic non-specific low back pain (CLBP) is one of the major health problems casting substantial amount of economicexpenses and negative impact on quality of life onto an individual as well as society. On contrary to public familiarity, theways of management of CLBP are diverse and there is yet no general consensus about which approach is better than othersor to whom the specific management should be applied. Some hold the negative point of view on the efficacy of the invasivemaneuver such as epidural injection because there is no controlled clinical trial (RCT) yielding better long term outcomeof those invasive managements over conservative ones. But the experts of interventional or surgical treatment stress the methodologicaldifficulty in performing RCT and assert that those invasive treatments can bring the prompt and complete resolutionof low back pain and restoration of function in appropriately selected cases. These seemingly opposite views on theinvasive management on CLBP are rather complimentary each other than to be contradictory.
  • 1,818 View
  • 4 Download
TOP